News & Events
Superior Court confirms “relevance” and “not otherwise attainable” requirements in enforcing letters rogatory.
February 8, 2016
In Intelsat USA Sales LLC v. Hyde and Majic, Justice Faieta refused to enforce letters rogatory directed against the former in-house counsel of the defendant company, which company was based in Ontario. The basis for Justice Faieta’s decision was that the former in-house counsel’s evidence was not necessary for trial and the evidence to be
Superior Court confirms “relevance” and “not otherwise attainable” requirements in enforcing letters rogatory.
February 8, 2016
In Intelsat USA Sales LLC v. Hyde and Majic, Justice Faieta refused to enforce letters rogatory directed against the former in-house counsel of the defendant company, which company was based in Ontario. The basis for Justice Faieta’s decision was that the former in-house counsel’s evidence was not necessary for trial and the evidence to be
