News & Events

When we act as counsel to employers, we can be confronted with policies and practices which often have been in place for a long time and may turn out to not actually be in compliance with employment standards requirements. If we work together, we can attempt to find a route typically to become compliant and

The Michaels v. Red Deer College decision of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1976 held that employees pursuing wrongful dismissal damages have a duty to mitigate their damages.  Mitigation earnings reduce the liability of the employer for damages during the notice period to the extent of those earnings.  But what if the terminated employee

The Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017[1] (“SFO”) comes into force on July 1, 2018, repealing and replacing the Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2015[2] and the Smoke-Free Ontario Act[3] (collectively, the “Repealed Acts”). Most notably for employers, the SFO contains new posting requirements for signs and prohibitions regarding the use of medical cannabis. The SFO expands on the

On January 1, 2018, a number of amendments to the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) came into effect under Bill 148. These amendments required substantial updates to employer practices, policies, and handbooks. One of the amendments was to the public holiday pay formula in Part X of the ESA.  However, the new rules and formula

The issue of what a court will do when faced with a claim for variable compensation in the form of a Carried Interest Plan, much like a profit sharing plan, in which profit was recognized some 3-7 years following the initial investment, came before the Honourable Mr. Justice Monahan recently. In a decision released in

Effective April 1, 2018, the equal pay amendments to the Employment Standards Act (“ESA“) flowing from the Bill 148 Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act officially came into force in Ontario. These equal pay provisions prohibit any employer paying different rates of pay to employees because of a difference in employment status (eg. full-time, part-time and/or

The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in a decision released this past summer, took the opportunity to remind employers that precision in drafting restrictive covenants (those of non-competition in particular) is a necessity. In this particular case, an optical company operating retail stores and eye examination clinics had a non-competition covenant within contracts with its

On December 15, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada (“Supreme Court”) delivered a significant decision in the area of human rights law. According to the Supreme Court, employers are not the only ones who are prohibited from committing discriminatory harassment against employees. British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk concerned claims of discrimination in the

In an unprecedented decision released by the Court of Appeal recently, the Court has found the use of the word “probation” in an Employment Agreement has the meaning that during the stated period of time, employment may be terminated with payment only as is required by the Employment Standards Legislation. Notwithstanding requirements that contracts be

The Court of Appeal has again ruled on the issue of terms in employment contracts which purport to limit an employee to minimum notice under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) upon termination. In North v. Metaswitch, the Court of Appeal held that it is improper to use a severability clauses to remove portions of