News & Events

As public health responses adapt to an ongoing and evolving COVID-19 pandemic, now dominated by the Omicron variant, arbitrators continue to consider whether mandatory workplace vaccination policies remain reasonable. In two recent decisions, Alectra Utilities Corporation v Power Workers’ Union and FCA Canada Inc. v Unifor, Locals 195, 444, 1285, labour arbitrators recognized the importance

In a decision issued on February 7, 2022, Arbitrator Gail Misra struck down an employer’s policy for mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 to the extent that the policy contemplated termination as an “automatic” penalty for non-compliance. The decision deals with a policy grievance by Healthcare, Office and Professional Employees Union, Local 2220 (“the Union”) against Chartwell

In a recent decision, Arbitrator Michael Mitchell upheld a policy on mandatory vaccination (which required two doses in addition to any recommended boosters) against COVID-19 as it applied to employees who work in an indoor setting at least some of the time.[1] The Power Workers’ Union (“the Union”) filed a policy grievance against the vaccination

On January 12, 2022, Arbitrator Randall J. Noonan released a decision in which he denied an application by the International Association of Professional Firefighters, Local 1286 (“IAFF”) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Locals 718 and 394 (“CUPE”) (together, the “Unions”) to stay the application of a mandatory vaccination policy (the “Policy”) by the

In a decision released on January 12th, 2022, Arbitrator Jesin held that a workplace mandatory Covid-19 vaccination policy and associated vaccination status disclosure requirement issued by Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (“MLSE” or the “Employer”) for employees working at its Toronto sports and events venue Scotia Bank Arena was a reasonable exercise of the Employer’s

In a pair of decisions released back-to-back, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed separate applications alleging that trade unions violated their Duty of Fair Representation in relation to their handling of complaints concerning employer COVID-19 vaccine policies. On January 10 and 11 2022, the Board released its decisions in Bloomfield v SEIU, Local 1 and

In a decision released on January 4, 2022, Arbitrator Herman denied a grievance from the United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 175 (“UFCW”) concerning a workplace policy on mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 issued by Bunge Hamilton Canada (“Bunge”). UFCW grieved that the policy—which placed non-compliant employees on unpaid leave—was an unreasonable exercise of managerial

In a decision released on November 15, 2021, Arbitrator Denis Nadeau found that a vaccination requirement promulgated by customers of several housekeeping contractors infringed the right to respect for private life provided for in Article 5 of the Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms (the “Quebec Charter“)[1]. However, in light of Article 9.1 of the Charter, Arbitrator Nadeau held that

In Manitoba Federation of Labour et al v. The Government of Manitoba, the Manitoba Court of Appeal held that the province’s public sector wage restraint legislation did not violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”). In deciding as such, the Court of Appeal overturned a ruling by the Court of Queen’s Bench. Under the leadership of

In a decision released on November 11, 2021, Arbitrator John Stout allowed a grievance filed by the Power Workers’ Union (the “PWU”) against the Electrical Safety Authority (the “ESA”) challenging a mandatory vaccination and disclosure policy. In September 2021, the ESA adopted a voluntary vaccination disclosure and testing policy (the “Voluntary Policy”) that allowed employees